Skip to content
Don't Feed the TrollsGet help

Astroturfing

Also written: fake grassroots

Organised activity dressed as a spontaneous grassroots movement, run by a concealed interest.

Escalation:
Coordinated / multi-account
Type:
Identity & coordination

Where the term comes from

Lexicographic: Merriam-Webster carries an entry. The name plays on AstroTurf, the artificial substitute for grass — the point being that it looks like grassroots and is manufactured.

[1]

The deception is not the message. It is the apparent number of independent people holding it.

Why it works

People reasonably treat consensus as evidence. If many unconnected individuals have arrived at the same view, that is genuinely informative — which is exactly why manufacturing the appearance of it is worth someone's money.

It also shifts what looks normal. A position held by an apparent crowd is a position that can be stated without social cost, which is often the actual objective rather than persuading anyone specific.

Recognising it

Signals, none of them proof on its own:

  • Accounts with thin or recently-created histories converging on one topic
  • Near-identical phrasing across supposedly independent voices
  • Activity clustered into working hours in a particular timezone
  • Enthusiasm that does not extend to any adjacent subject the account claims to care about
  • No trace of the people involved existing anywhere else

Every one of these has an innocent explanation. New accounts are new for ordinary reasons; people who care about a topic do repeat each other's phrasing; campaigns do send supporters talking points openly. The pattern across many accounts is what carries weight, and even then it is consistent with coordination rather than evidence of it.

What to do

Very little, individually — and that is the honest answer. You are not the audience for astroturfing; the wider readership is. Arguing with the accounts is the least useful available action, because their number is the point and their individual arguments are not.

What helps is naming the pattern once, for the readership, and then leaving it. Platforms have reporting categories for coordinated inauthentic behaviour, and that is where the volume can actually be acted on.

Not the same as

An organised campaign that says who it is
Campaigning openly on behalf of an interest is ordinary politics and commerce. The deception is concealment of who is behind it, not organisation itself.
A genuine movement you disagree with
Real grassroots movements are often better organised and better funded than opponents assume. Calling something astroturf because it is effective is itself a way of dismissing people.

Responding at this level

Disengaging no longer ends it, because you were never the audience. This is where documentation, platform reporting and support become the real moves, and where "just ignore it" starts doing harm as advice.

Others at this level

  • Sockpuppetry — One person running multiple accounts to manufacture the appearance of independent agreement.

Sources

  1. [1] Astroturfing (definition), Merriam-Webster [archived]
    “organized activity that is intended to create a false impression of a widespread, spontaneously arising, grassroots movement”